Reflections on two months of fieldwork in Moroto, Uganda: Exploring kitchen gardens and their role in food security

Published

This blog post was written by Mary Theodorah Ajal, Master’s student in Sustainable Food Systems at SLU.

Theodorah in one of the kitchen gardens in Uganda. Photo: Justin Kitibwa 

Returning to Sweden after 8 weeks of intense data collection/fieldwork in Moroto, Northeastern Uganda, is great. In October 2024, I received a Minor Field Study grant through SLU Global, financed by Sida, that facilitated my research and stay in Uganda. I travelled to Uganda in the first week of October 2024.

My journey to Moroto by bus was filled with wonder, curiosity, and surprises as we drew closer to the Karamoja region. The 7-hour journey from my hometown, Tororo, to Moroto, was a fascinating experience, with the bus making numerous stops to pick up passengers along the trading centers. The most surprising twist was when goats, chickens, sacs of charcoal, and big jerrycans of local brew were added to the bus. We, the passengers, livestock, and other items, got tucked together like peas in a pod, utilizing all spaces including the bus aisle space. It was a journey filled with unexpected discoveries!

I was welcomed and received by the Drylands Transform team of Uganda, Professor Denis Mpairwe, Dr Alice Turinawe, and Mr. Zachary Angella, who offered me valuable guidance during my fieldwork and stay in Uganda.

My research on Characterization and productivity of kitchen gardens and their contributions to food security and livelihoods in Karamoja covered six sub-counties (Nadunget, Northern Division, Loputuk, Katikekile, Rupa, and Lotisan) and 16 villages (Ariamawoi, Kalkalet, kamera, Katamukono, Kidepo, Lakalia, Longoroko, Matheniko, Moroto hospital quarters, Moroto junior quarters, Moroto prisons, Municipal primary, Nabuin, Nadiket, Nakapelimen, and Okilala), within a 40km radius in Moroto district. The study respondent categories included households, development partners/NGOs, government, Drylands Transform team, and Kitchen garden trainers.

It was interesting interacting with the households in the study and learning about their experiences with kitchen gardening and why they started. The commonest motives for household kitchen gardening have been food, income, motivation by government and development partners, leisure, and others because of their great passion for gardening.

It was also interesting to know what different participants considered a kitchen garden and what the development partners/NGOs and the government considered the most successful kitchen gardening approach.

My research also uncovered a diverse range of kitchen gardening approaches. Some development partners/NGOs considered backyard gardening the most successful approach, while others believed the Farmer field school was the most successful. I also came across a fascinating kitchen gardening approach that uses E-learning books about kitchen garden use and construction—an approach where tablets are given to tablet teachers. The community can learn about kitchen gardening with tablets by watching short clips and illustrations on step-by-step guides and the materials used. The community members touch on an area of their choice on the tablet, which then pops up on the screen with audio translated into Karamojong. This diversity of approaches was truly enlightening.

It was interesting to know that respondents in the study perceived and defined a kitchen garden differently; however, the definitions had similar components, such as the purpose of the garden, its proximity to home, its proximity to a water source, the techniques used, and its size.

Although learning about kitchen gardens was interesting and enlightening, I experienced some challenges.

For instance, my translator and I had to travel long distances by foot to locate kitchen gardens since it was a dry season and few households had them. This was physically demanding and time-consuming. I also experienced challenges with access to the field, especially when it rained. The roads were very slippery when it rained, so I postponed fieldwork until the sun shone brightly. Once, we crossed a flowing river to get to the next village, which was a risky and challenging task.

Walking long distances to locate the kitchen gardens. Photo: Justin Kitibwa

Sometimes even crossing flowing rivers. Photo: Justin Kitibwa

Moroto town is close to a military training school. Whenever the soldiers had their training, the gunshots and other sounds made by the military equipment were loud. It always felt like there was a war going on. I am glad that by the time I left, the gunshots never bothered me like before.

During my research in Moroto, I learned the importance of being flexible and having an open mind. These qualities facilitate learning and fact-finding and create room for innovation.

I learned the importance of a sound support system comprised of networks and relationships. This support system played a crucial role in my research process. Whenever I struggled with my research or on one of those low days, I contacted one of my networks or relations for help. Their guidance and support were invaluable in overcoming challenges and staying motivated. I travelled with my children to Uganda; my family took care of my children while I focused on the research.

Parallel with writing this blog post, I am now writing on my master’s thesis.

All in all, I would like to thank my supervisor, Prof. Ingrid Öborn, Assoc. Prof. Sigrun Dahlin, Prof. Agneta Hörnell, Dr Alice Turinawe, Dr Stephen Mureithi, and Prof. Denis Mpairwe, thank you for your continuous support and guidance for my master’s thesis. I want to thank Ms. Kitibwa Justin, who helped me with translations during the research, and Mr. Zachary Angelle, who coordinated all the fieldwork activities and ensured I was safe and comfortable while in Moroto.  Lastly, I would like to thank my family, friends, and colleagues for their priceless support. Thanks to SLU Global for the Minor Field Study grant that facilitated my travel and research activities in Uganda.

Financial adventures in the Democratic Republic of Congo – going back to the basics

Published

This blog is written by Therese Rantakokko, financial officer at SLU Global.

The campus at the Université Catholique de Congo. Photo: Therese Rantakokko

“What is your profession?” That is the first question I received while going through migration at Kinshasa airport. With my rather poor Duolingo French I manage to explain that I’m a financial officer. A financial officer you might think, what is a financial officer doing on a duty travel in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) when the project is about environmental assessment? Shouldn’t it be the researcher travelling? Is it really necessary for a financial officer to travel so far to such to a country to where only necessary travels are allowed according to the Ministry for Foreign Affairs in Sweden?

My answer, which of course is subjective, is Yes. Without a working administration in the background, the researchers will have problems in conducting their tasks. The administrators and financial people in the team are important. In a context like in the DRC it is even more important that the administration is running, if not smooth, at least as smoothly as possible. A project like this might be seen as having two sides, the Swedish and the Congolese. However, that is not the way you can look at a cooperation like this. We are one team, where each team member contributes with their expertise weather it is a professor, a student or a financial officer.

I know the Swedish context and I have been working with projects funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation (Sida) for the last ten years. My colleague at the Université Catholique de Congo (UCC), in the DRC, knows the local context there and have a long experience from working with other funders. By working together, we will make sure that the administrative routines are in place. That the legal framework on both the Swedish side and Congolese side is fulfilled. Together we can also build routines that are efficient for the project.

My Congolese colleague Othis Kitoko and I. Photo: SƓur Marie-Rose Ndimbo

At SLU we work in a very digital environment to handle our financial matters, more or less everything is handled in systems that are digital and integrated with each other. It is hard to do something outside the systems. In the DRC on the other hand, there are almost no digital systems. It is a context relying very much on cash. Despite the different contexts we have one project and need to report everything as one project, therefor it is of great importance that we understand each other’s contexts and discuss these issues within the team.

At SLU the accounting on an invoice is made in the system and we can easily withdraw the reports we need just by clicking. My problem sometimes is about which report to use as there are so many in the system. My colleague at the UCC on the other side, have to create the reports from the cashbooks, often by using an Excel file. A lot of the information that the system keeps track of for me, he has to keep track of manually, such as how the payment was made, by bank transfer, cash or check. It is not always easy, and you need to keep your papers and files in order. The order of the files and documentation must also be easy for someone else to follow. Projects funded by Sida are always externally audited.

SƓur Marie-Rose Ndimbo and Othis Kitoko. Photo: Therese Rantakokko

Lunch break with my Congolese colleagues Othis Kitoko, Seur Marie-Rose Ndimbo and Bila-Isia Inogwabini (right). Photo: Therese Rantakokko

However, this way of working is not new to me. Some 20 years ago I was working in Sudan for a Non Governmental Organisation (NGO). Although the NGO had a great financial system at the headquarters (HQ) back in Europe, we were not using it in the field. Internet access was limited, and we used Excel-files that was imported to the financial system on regular basis for the HQ to do their follow ups. One of the first things I got to learn while working in Sudan was how to create simple pivot-tables in Excel in order to get reports that we could use on daily basis. In this way we could get the reports we needed to conduct our work, and we did not have to wait for the HQ to send us the monthly reports. During this visit to DRC it was my turn to introduce pivottables to my colleague. From this we can build our project reports fulfilling the needs of the project as well as from the funder. When working in contexts with different conditions going back to basics is the way forward as Basic knowledge never fades.

 

 

Challenging young minds

Published

This blog post is written by Kerstin Scragg, teacher at Celsiusskolan in Uppsala. 

Me and Erik, one of the high school students from SLU Youth Institute.

I have had the great pleasure to join SLU Youth Institute in Des Moines, Iowa, to participate at Global Youth Institute and the World Food Prize conference which focuses on future food security. We have enjoyed inspiring talks and lectures, participated in different workshops and our two Swedish high school students have presented essays at a round table conversation together with other students and experts in respective field.  I work as a teacher at a high school in Uppsala and this trip really started a year ago when I signed my class up to write the Global Youth Institute’s Global Challenge essay. The overall topic of these essays is the UN’s sustainable development goal 2, End Hunger. The students chose a country with food insecurity related problems, in addition, they described the food security situation in the country and explained what is currently being done to battle these issues. In the end, they handed their essays in to SLU Youth Institute where some were chosen to participate in one of three round table conversations, given at each campus. One, out of these twenty-five students at each round table conversation, was elected to go to the U.S. to present the essay and take part of the Global Youth Institute conference in Des Moines, so here we are.

At the Global Youth Institute in Des Moines, we have enjoyed several interesting talks and presentations by leading figures in the battle of ending hunger globally, such as the CEO at the African Bank, the United States Secretary of Agriculture, this years’ World Food Prize laureates and many more. One example of a lecture was when we learned more about deep space travelling and some challenges feeding the crew during these journeys. Another interesting lecture taught us how artificial intelligence, AI, can help women in agriculture.

Maja and Erik at the House of Laureates

What I find inspiring is how these, about a hundred teenagers, are at the very centre of it all. Whether it being the content of the talks or activities chosen, all is relevant and elaborated for these possible future researchers and policy makers and, despite the long days, seems to succeed in engaging them no matter the topic. It is truly luxurious to watch and take part in these days, which I am sure will shape these young minds for a long time. This is not only an important investment for the future but also a way to let these students know how much they matter.

We are probably all aware of some of the challenges that Swedish schools face, such as large class sizes, which leads to the fact that it can be difficult to challenge gifted students every lesson. During this conference students are just that, they are challenged both socially and intellectually. To me, seeing my student, along with the others, being stimulated and inspired by the activities and talks at the Global Youth Institute, has been the most rewarding part of the journey and I can only hope I get to send more students to Global Youth Institute in the future.


 

SLU Youth Institute (SLU YI) aims to create interest among Swedish youth for global food security and to find sustainable solutions to the global challenges based on the UN Sustainable Development Goals. SLU Youth Institute is the Swedish part of many Youth Institutes coordinated by the World Food Prize Foundation. Read more at our Swedish website!

The October week when Lund became the hub of global development research as over 150 researchers gathered for the DevRes 2024 conference

Published

This blog post is written by Emelie Zonabend König, research advisor at SLU Global.

PhD student Karolin Andersson, SLU, presenting at DevRes.
Photo: Emelie Zonabend König

DevRes (the Development Research conference) is a bi-annual conference gathering Swedish development and sustainability researchers from different academic disciplines to exchange ideas and network as well as promote collaboration with practitioners, organisations and policy makers. DevRes 2024 was hosted by Lund University and the conference theme was “Reaching the Sustainable Development Goals in a polarised world”.

Although I missed the critical discussions on the first day, it quickly became clear that the exchanges taking place were of great importance. Among other things, the Swedish Research Council presented their newly published report “Development research at the Swedish Research Council 2013-2023”. It is a nice piece worth reading.

During the conference we heard about concrete projects showing how development research has led to tangible benefits. For instance, one project focused on improving maternity care by training healthcare workers, by among other things letting the pregnant woman sit on a stool while giving birth and leaning on a support person which has helped reduce birth-related injuries in several African countries. Another project showcased how collaboration with NASA enhanced systematic air quality monitoring in Ethiopia. These examples underscore the real-world impact of development research when it is applied effectively.

Yet, while the outcomes of development research are inspiring, the field has faced significant challenges in Sweden. In recent years, Swedish development researchers has grappled with severe funding cuts, including the complete elimination, and the government has been phasing out Agenda 2030 from the mandates of its authorities, which has raised concerns about Sweden’s commitment to global development goals.

A new troubling development that was discussed during the conference is the decision by Formas, the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development, to limit external collaboration by allowing only 15% of research funding to go to researchers outside Sweden. Interestingly, the Swedish Research Council (VetenskapsrÄdet) has taken a different legal interpretation, suggesting there may be room for policy reform. This will be interesting to follow.

DevRes 2024 gathered representatives from 35 different universities and offered more than just a space to express concerns — it provided a platform for researchers to come together, present their fascinating research, share ideas, learn from each other, and brainstorm about new ways forward. In a time when development research faces immense challenges, the opportunity to network and support each other is more important than ever. We must find creative solutions to navigate the changing funding landscape, while celebrating the excellent work being done across the globe.

The conversations and collaborations we build are crucial. As much as we value the technical insights, it’s the human connections that will propel us into the future. We must continue to meet, discuss, and challenge each other. We also need to share the relevance of our work outside of our own choir, and I was glad to hear that the steering of SweDev took the main role to write a debate article about the harsh situation for Swedish development researchers. This was later published in Altinget.

A big thank you to the organisers and all others involved in making DevRes 2024 such a success. Even in the face of setbacks, let’s keep these conversations going and work together to ensure that development research continues to thrive.

The world is very big, but is it as big as we think?

Published

This blog post is written by Einar Nordgren, Vice Chair of the Joint Committee of Student Unions of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU).

Drinking my morning coffee on the terrace of the headquarters of the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nation’s (FAO). Photo: Jens MĂ„rtensson

It was with an ounce of confusion that I stepped into the FAO headquarters in Rome at the start of the World Food Forum, what will happen, is there anyone here that I know and what will I be able to contribute?

One of these questions was cleared up quite quickly when I entered the entrance and met representatives from SLU and Alnarp Agroecology Farm, but the other questions were still unsolved.

During the various sessions organised, I came to the realisation quite quickly that I could contribute and bring home thoughts and reflections. Much of what was discussed was linked to the involvement of young people in decision-making. Something that I, in my role as Vice President of Sluss (The Joint Committee of Student Unions of SLU), work with daily and that I also realised that in Sweden we are good at involving young people in decision-making.

A session on the opportunities and challenges of agriculture and forestry from the perspective of young people.
Photo: Einar Nordgren

But I also came to another realisation, and that is that the word sustainability has different meanings depending on where in the world we are. When I think about sustainable food production from a Swedish perspective, it’s about being economical, reducing climate impact through emissions and economising on the resources we have. I looked at the Swedish Board of Agriculture’s website to see how they have defined sustainability and in summary, their definition is about economic and environmental sustainability, but also social sustainability to fulfil human rights. During the World Food Forum, sustainable food production was discussed from a completely different perspective, namely ensuring the long-term ability to put nutritious food on the table.

The fact that sustainable food production can be defined in two such different ways was something I hadn’t realised before, but is very important to keep in mind.

Having the opportunity to participate in events like these is a privilege and something that should not be taken for granted. Students from all over the world participated in the World Food Forum, but there was one thing that separated the two groups. Namely, the conditions to participate, both when it came to getting a visa to travel to Rome, but also the financial aspect. While the majority of the students had received financial support to participate, the common factor for those who had paid for their own participation was that these were people who came from countries that do not have a stable and secure food supply.

As I sat down and listened to the different speakers and had a look around the room on the first day, I realised how big the world is!

The conference hall at the FAO headquarters. Photo: Einar Nordgren

But a few days later it turns out that it may not be as big as I think. During my second year as a student at SLU, I went on a study trip to Slovenia to see how their forestry works and I had the opportunity to meet and talk to the forestry students there. In a corridor at FAO in Rome I met one of these students again. I have heard the saying ‘The forest is not as big as you think’ during my education, but I never thought when I stepped into the World Food Forum that I would say the world is not as big as you think.

Back at campus Ultuna, I will now try to summarise a couple of extremely interesting and instructive days in Rome. Linking back to the title of this blog post, I have realised how big the world is when one word can mean so many different things, but at the same time so small, especially when you have decided which direction to take, both professionally and academically.

With regards from Einar

 

About the World Food Forum

The World Food Forum (WFF) was launched in 2021 by the Youth Committee of the the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), as an independent network of partners. Hosted within FAO, it serves as the premier global platform to actively shape agrifood systems for a better food future, accelerating the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Through youth action, science and innovation, and investment, the WFF forges new paths of action and multi-sector partnerships for agrifood impact at the local, regional and global levels to achieve a more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and hunger-free food future for all.