Nordic insect production discussed at a workshop in Denmark

Nordic Insect workshop focusing on development of insect production for feed and food was arranged by DTU and Nordic Working Group for Microbiology & Animal Health and Welfare (NMDD) In Roskilde, Denmark. Evgheni Ermolaev from our group and Bettina Julin from the Swedish National Food Agency represented Sweden at the meeting.


At the workshop each country representatives discussed the current status of national legislations regarding insect production for food and feed purposes. In Sweden the current interpretation of the novel food regulation does not allow any insects to be reared for food production. A different interpretation of the regulation in Finland and Denmark allowed consumption of whole insects. However, this regulation has been amended to clarify that insects (including whole insects and their parts) must be registered as novel foods.

  Regulation (EC)
No. 258/97
Regulation (EC)
2015/2283
Whole insects
Not in scope*

In scope
Parts of the whole insects and ingredients processed from whole insects (e.g. whole insect flour)
Not in scope*

In scope
Ingredients other than (parts of) whole insects (e.g. insect extracts)
In scope

In scope

* Diverging national interpretation – Some member states did not consider these categories of products to be covered by novel foods regulation

The new regulation is entering in force from 1st of January 2019, before that insect producers are encouraged to apply for novel food registration of their products, and are allowed to continue their production activities until a decision about novel food registration has been taken at EU level. Once a novel food is approved, it will be allowed for consumption at all EU member states and anyone is allowed to start producing these insects unless data protection has been requested. In that case there is a 5 year delay before the novel food production process details are made public.

Currently many novel food applications for process producing insect-based food have been submitted (List of ongoing applications). See several examples below:

Applicant Data protection Food category Common name
Belgian Insect Industry Federation (BiiF) No Acheta domesticus for consumption as a food and as an ingredient in additional food groups House cricket
Belgian Insect Industry Federation (BiiF) No Migratory locust (Locusta migratoria) Migratory locust (grasshopper)
Belgian Insect Industry Federation (BiiF) No Yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) Mealworm
Waraphorn Blanck No Whole Schistocerca gegaria Desert locust
Verdis Nature S.L. No Finished food based on insects
Proti-Farm Holding NV Yes Whole and grinded Alphitobius diaperinus larvae products Lesser mealworm
SAS EAP Group – MICRONUTRIS Yes Dried crickets (Gryllodes sigillatus) Tropical house cricket
SAS EAP Group – MICRONUTRIS) Yes Dried mealworms (Tenebrio molitor) Mealworm

During the discussions at the workshop it was established that there is a need to have at least three separate tracks when discussing with law makers: insets as food, insects for feed production and insects for technical use (non-feed and non-food). This is necessary in order to develop a clear terminology, but also to be able to address the different needs each of the three directions of insect use may have. For instance, in Sweden it is two different agencies that regulate insect use for food and insect use for feed production, Swedish National Food Agency and Swedish Board of Agriculture, respectively. After the workshop collaborations and discussions will be continued and the Nordic Council of Ministers will be involved. They will contribute to the development a Nordic insect roadmap, which is aimed to simplify the implementation of insect production in the Nordic region.

Contact
Evgheni Ermolaev

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *